Thug Life (2025) Movie Movies4u
Thug Life, the much-awaited 2025 Tamil gangster drama, brings together Kamal Haasan and Mani Ratnam after 38 years since their iconic Nayakan. Directed by Ratnam, who co-wrote with Haasan, this film features a stellar cast including Silambarasan, Trisha Krishnan, Ali Fazal, and Aishwarya Lekshmi.
| Film Title: | Thug Life |
| Main Cast: | Kamal Haasan, Silambarasan, Trisha Krishnan |
| Film Duration: | 2h 45m |
| Category: | Action, Drama, Crime |
| Primary Star: | Kamal Haasan |
| Studio: | Raajkamal Films International, Madras Talkies |
| Premiere Date: | June 4, 2025 |
| Filmmaker: | Mani Ratnam |

Set in New Delhi’s underworld, the film carries the weight of massive expectations. With A.R. Rahman’s music and high production values from Raaj Kamal Films and Madras Talkies, this gangster action drama promised to recreate the magic of the legendary duo’s previous collaboration.
Thug Life Movie Actors
| Actor | Character |
|---|---|
| Ashok Selvan | Jaikumar Royappa |
| Silambarasan | Amaran |
| Joju George | Kanjirapally Pathros |
| Nassar | Manikkam |
| Kamal Haasan | Rangaraya Sakthivel |
| Mahesh Manjrekar | Sadanand |
| Abhirami | Jeeva |
| Ali Fazal | Deepak Yadav |
| Sanjana Krishnamoorthy | Mangai |
| Trisha Krishnan | Indrani |



Plot and Story
The story follows Rangaraaya Sakthivel (Kamal Haasan), a feared mafia kingpin who adopts Amaran after saving him during a gang war. Years later, when Sakthivel survives an assassination attempt, he suspects Amaran’s betrayal, leading to a conflict of loyalty and revenge.
While the basic premise shows promise, the plot lacks originality. The storyline relies heavily on familiar gangster movie tropes without bringing fresh perspectives to the genre.
Cast Performance
Kamal Haasan delivers a committed performance as the aging don, bringing his characteristic intensity to the role. However, even his legendary acting skills couldn’t fully elevate the weak material.
Silambarasan struggles with limited character development despite having a significant role. Trisha Krishnan and other female actors are unfortunately reduced to mere plot devices rather than fully realized characters.
Direction and Technical Aspects
Mani Ratnam’s direction shows his technical expertise in certain sequences, particularly in the first half. The cinematography and color palette effectively capture the gritty underworld atmosphere.
However, the film’s pacing becomes problematic in the latter half. A.R. Rahman’s score, while competent, doesn’t reach the heights of his previous collaborations with either filmmaker.
Reviews and Ratings
The film currently holds a 4.3/10 rating on IMDb, reflecting mixed-to-negative reception. Rotten Tomatoes critics noted that while the movie has emotions and action, the thin plot and poor execution make it less engaging.
Regional critics described it as A Fall from the Hill, criticizing its lack of originality. The Hollywood Reporter India mentioned that despite bold vision, the film remains emotionally distant from audiences.
What I Liked
I appreciated Kamal Haasan’s screen presence and his commitment to the character despite the script’s limitations. The production values are impressive, and certain action sequences showcase Ratnam’s visual storytelling skills effectively.
The authentic locations in Delhi add credibility to the underworld setting. I also found the cinematography decent in capturing the dark, gritty atmosphere that the story demanded.
What Could Be Better
The screenplay disappointed me the most – it felt unoriginal and relied too heavily on genre clichés. The character development, especially for women, was extremely poor and felt like a missed opportunity.
I noticed the pacing issues became more prominent in the second half, losing momentum when it should have intensified. The emotional depth that made Nayakan special is completely missing here, making the film feel hollow despite its technical competence.
Final Verdict
Thug Life represents a missed opportunity for what could have been a triumphant reunion. While it showcases moments of technical brilliance and features Haasan’s committed performance, it fails to deliver the emotional impact audiences expected.
The film serves as a reminder that nostalgia and star power alone cannot compensate for weak storytelling. For those expecting a return to the Nayakan form, this may prove disappointing, though fans of technical filmmaking might find some elements to appreciate.









